Jack comments on The things we know that we know ain't so - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (148)
Actually it wouldn't be that surprising if a lot of people thought they remembered hearing it.
Many magicians have specifically stated that people have reported seeing things in their act that they didn't do. James (The Amazing) Randi tells one such story:
Ulric Neisser is probably the person to start with this type of false/malleable memory problems. I have only found interesting things on google book search which do not lend themselves to quoting. Also I couldn't find much more recent studies in this field.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnFJ8cHAlco
This was repeated at least once.
The video backs up the account set out in the link I keep asking you to read.
Did you watch the video? He says "creating", as it says in the Snopes link. It's not a brilliant wording, but it's a reasonable misstatement.
Also, I think it's clear that most people use "create" and "invent" as synonyms most of the time, especially when the object being invented or created is one-of-a-kind (which is believed to be true for the internet by most of the public, though it isn't strictly true).
So, when someone says, "Al Gore says he invented the internet" and you say, "No, he said 'took the initiative in creating the internet' ", that someone is likely to say, "Why say 'no' if you're going to agree?"
Of course, if "created" sounded as silly as "invented", then we'd see both in accounts making fun of him; but the meme didn't take off until "invented" was substituted.
This is either a deliberate troll or an individual who, for whatever reason, cannot assimilate new information.
Don't think it's a deliberate troll - check the account, a history of what I think are sincere but sadly rather low-quality comments.