Jayson_Virissimo comments on The things we know that we know ain't so - Less Wrong

16 Post author: PhilGoetz 11 January 2010 09:59PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (148)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 12 January 2010 06:04:48PM 2 points [-]

I had a university physics textbook that claimed that those in the Middle Ages believed that the Earth was flat for "religious reasons". This myth has been going strong since the 19th century. What could possibly explain the persistence of these kinds of beliefs (from textbook authors no less!)?

Comment author: thomblake 13 January 2010 09:42:44PM 1 point [-]

What could possibly explain the persistence of these kinds of beliefs (from textbook authors no less!)

Well, a fact about what people in the Middle Ages believed isn't properly in the realm of Physics. I'd expect the physicists to be mostly right about the physics they put in their textbooks, and any other stuff in there should be considered highly suspect.

Consider it yet another exercise in skepticism.

Comment author: Seth_Goldin 12 January 2010 07:29:47PM 1 point [-]

Yes, this sounds more like a problem with textbooks than with science itself.

Textbooks are often censored for political reasons, such as Japanese textbooks' treatment of Nanjing, or American textbooks' treatment of the Japanese internment camps.

This is hard science though, so this won't suffice as an explanation. I fear that people are attached to superstitions about how the brain works. Maybe people like an inaccurately simplified explanation of the brain that claims that specific, local parts of the brain perform specific functions.

We know that fMRI research is pretty sketchy, but even smart people like Sam Harris seem to rely on it too much.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 13 January 2010 07:57:46PM 0 points [-]

Perhaps most people believed the Earth was flat, while most educated people did not.