Wei_Dai comments on Advice for AI makers - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 14 January 2010 11:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (196)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 14 January 2010 08:25:36PM *  3 points [-]

Today's specialized AIs have little chance of becoming self-improving, but as as specialized AIs adopt more advanced techniques (like the ones Nesov suggested), the line between specialized AIs and AGIs won't be so clear. After all, chess-playing and car-driving programs can always be implemented as AGIs with very specific and limited super-goals, so I expect that as AGI techniques advance, people working on specialized AIs will also adopt them, but perhaps without giving as much thought about the AI-foom problem.

Comment author: ChristianKl 16 January 2010 06:34:09PM 2 points [-]

I would think that specialization reduces the variant trees that the AI has to consider which makes it unlikely that implenting AGI techniques would help the chess playing program.