komponisto comments on Advancing Certainty - Less Wrong

34 Post author: komponisto 18 January 2010 09:51AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (108)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 18 January 2010 04:21:27PM 8 points [-]

Now, if it is the case that she didn't, then it follows that, given sufficient information about how-the-world-is, one's probability estimate could be made arbitrarily close to 0.

What, like 1/3^^^3? There isn't that much information in the universe, and come to think, I'm not sure I can conceive of any stream of evidence which would drive the probability that low in the Knox case, because there are complicated hypotheses much less complicated than that in which you're in a computer simulation expressly created for the purpose of deluding you about the Amanda Knox case.

Comment author: komponisto 18 January 2010 04:26:26PM 8 points [-]

I thought I was stating a mathematical tautology. I didn't say there was enough information in the universe to get below 1/3^^^3. The point was only that the information controls the probability.