CronoDAS comments on Winning the Unwinnable - Less Wrong

4 Post author: JRMayne 21 January 2010 03:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: CronoDAS 21 January 2010 06:41:32AM *  4 points [-]

Indeed, rollover jackpots can raise the expected value of a ticket (in dollars) above the price of the ticket - as long as nobody else wins and makes you split the prize with them. As for buying up every possible ticket combination, that's deliberately made to be as difficult as possible.

There are also slot machines in Vegas that operate on a similar rollover principle - the more money that is put into the bank of machines, the larger the jackpot gets, and that can eventually give the machine a positive expected value for the player.

Comment author: wedrifid 21 January 2010 07:07:52AM 3 points [-]

Indeed, rollover jackpots can raise the expected value of a ticket (in dollars) above the price of the ticket - as long as nobody else wins and makes you split the prize with them.

Wouldn't the expected value include such occurances?

There are also slot machines in Vegas that operate on a similar rollover principle - the more money that is put into the bank of machines, the larger the jackpot gets, and that can eventually give the machine a positive expected value for the player.

Peter Liston, a prominent figure from MENSA in Melbourne back when I used to be a member there, used this as his primary form of revenue. (Australian slot machines not Vegas ones obviously). He objected somewhat to the term 'Professional Gambler', observing that once you do it professionally the term becomes very nearly oxymoronic. It's the only investment he makes that consistently makes money. Stockmarket investment is far less reliable than a known RNG over a significant number of rolls.

Comment author: CronoDAS 21 January 2010 07:09:32PM *  4 points [-]

There are also some video poker machines that are beatable if you use the right strategy. (And the right strategy is usually rather counter-intuitive, as it often involves throwing away every card that can't be part of a royal flush from an otherwise promising hand, because about half your total expected payout comes from the royal flush jackpot.)

Comment author: wedrifid 21 January 2010 11:13:32PM 0 points [-]

Really? What is your expected payoff? Or perhaps, what is your expected earnings per hour?

Comment author: Wei_Dai 22 January 2010 02:05:06AM *  3 points [-]

Here are some figures from http://www.gamemasteronline.com/Archive/VideoPoker/AllAmericanVideoPokerDiary-1.shtml

  • Expected payoff: 100.72% plus comps
  • Expected earnings per hour: $8 per hour (including comps)

My understanding is that sometimes you can do better, like when a casino has special offers or promotions. You can also do something like this at online casinos, BTW, although I haven't personally tried it.

Comment author: magfrump 21 January 2010 07:19:17AM 0 points [-]

The expected value is a function of the jackpot, so it varies relative to the price of the ticket which is constant.

Comment author: wedrifid 21 January 2010 07:22:57AM 0 points [-]

The expected value is a function of the jackpot, so it varies relative to the price of the ticket which is constant.

.... yes.

The expected value is also influenced by the number of other tickets purchased. Neglecting that would give you the wrong expected value (see CronDAS's caveat).

Comment author: magfrump 21 January 2010 04:39:48PM 1 point [-]

Rereading the comment chain I see that I was misreading your post the first time through. Sorry!