thomblake comments on What big goals do we have? - Less Wrong

10 Post author: cousin_it 19 January 2010 04:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (92)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: thomblake 19 January 2010 07:12:37PM 3 points [-]

The cereal-box-top Aristotelian response:

Big goals, as you describe them, are not good. For valuable things, there can be too much or too little; having an inappropriate amount of concern for such a thing is a vice of excess or deficiency. Having the appropriate amount of concern for valuable things is virtue, and having the right balance of valuable things in your life is eudaimonia, "the good life".

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 January 2010 07:14:22PM 6 points [-]

Can you have too much eudaimonia?

Comment author: thomblake 19 January 2010 07:28:09PM 3 points [-]

The usual story is that it's binary - at each moment, you either have it or you don't. It would explain why Aristotle thought most people would never get there.

Over time, I'm sure this could be expressed as trying to maximize something.

Comment author: cousin_it 19 January 2010 08:28:21PM 0 points [-]

Yeah, can f(x) be too equal to 3?