= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
MrHen comments on My Fundamental Question About Omega - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (151)
I had this sitting in my drafts folder and noticed another long discussion about two-boxing versus one-boxing and realized that the next step in the conversation was similar to the point I was trying to make here.
If this post doesn't get voted up and promoted, then please post "the next step in the conversation" as a comment here rather than its own post.
"The next step in the conversation" was referring to the next step in the aforementioned conversation on two-boxing and has nothing to do with this post.
If the post doesn't get promoted than I will not post any further thoughts on Omega, Newcomb's or anything else related.
I wouldn't mind getting the problem resolved, though. Do you agree with the answer given by Morendil?