MrHen comments on My Fundamental Question About Omega - Less Wrong

6 Post author: MrHen 10 February 2010 05:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (151)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MrHen 10 February 2010 07:02:29PM 2 points [-]

We don't have to worry about Omega's motivations at all, because, in a proper Omega scenario, Omega's actions in repsonse to every possible state of the scenario is exactly specified.

Right. I used the term "not malevolent" for this. What term would you have used?

Comment author: JGWeissman 10 February 2010 07:09:59PM 3 points [-]

"Has exactly specified behavior" would work.

Comment author: MrHen 10 February 2010 07:17:29PM 0 points [-]

Sure, that works. How about, "(b) has explicitly defined behavior." Does that translate okay?