thomblake comments on Costs to (potentially) eternal life - Less Wrong

8 Post author: bgrah449 21 January 2010 09:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (107)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 22 January 2010 04:42:48PM 0 points [-]

making everything much safer

When I hear the word 'safer' I reach for my gun.

Comment author: RobinZ 22 January 2010 04:48:06PM 0 points [-]

I assume "safer" means things like "Click It or Ticket" - what are you referring to?

Comment author: MichaelGR 22 January 2010 05:03:31PM *  3 points [-]

Yeah, I was mostly thinking about things like safer cars (more safety testing and more stringent tests, better materials, next generation 'vehicle stability control' and laser cruise control used for emergency braking, mesh networking, 4-point seatbelts, etc), better design of sidewalks and bike paths, the hardening of buildings in earthquake and hurricane-prone areas, automatic monitoring systems on swimming pools to prevent accidental drowning, etc.

But really, what do people die from in stable rich countries? It's really the diseases of aging that we need to cure (see SENS.org). After that, your chances of dying from an accident are already very low as things stand, and there are still lots of low-hanging fruit ways to make things safer...

I don't think making us very safe in the near-term requires a Big Brother state keeping us in plastic bubbles.

And if we take care of aging, most people will probably live long enough without dying in an accident to either see Friendly AI or some form of brain backup technology further reduce risk, or they'll all die from an existential risk that we've failed to prevent.