JulianMorrison comments on Costs to (potentially) eternal life - Less Wrong

8 Post author: bgrah449 21 January 2010 09:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (107)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bgrah449 22 January 2010 09:21:20PM 3 points [-]

Imagine Omega said, "The person behind you will live for 30 seconds if you don't kill her. If you kill her, you will continue leading a long and healthy life. If you don't, you will also die in 30 seconds."

Do you say the same thing to Omega and continue enjoying your 30 seconds of life?

Comment author: JulianMorrison 23 January 2010 02:10:26AM 2 points [-]

No difference. I won't buy my life with murder at any price. (Weighing one-against-many innocents is a different problem.)

And I'd be calling Omega a bastard because, as an excellent predictor, he'd know that, but decided to ruin my day by telling me anyway.

Comment author: bgrah449 23 January 2010 05:08:19AM 1 point [-]

Can you explain, then, how this is different then suicide, since your theft of her life is minimal, yet your sacrifice of your own life is large?

Comment author: JulianMorrison 23 January 2010 08:26:29PM 0 points [-]

It's not suicide, I'm just bumping into a moral absolute - I won't murder under those circumstances, so outcomes conditional on "I commit murder" are pruned from the search tree. If the only remaining outcome is "I die", then drat.