pdf23ds comments on Costs to (potentially) eternal life - Less Wrong

8 Post author: bgrah449 21 January 2010 09:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (107)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Gritsenko 22 January 2010 09:51:39PM -1 points [-]

First, the only certainties in life are death and taxes. Cryonics aside, we should talk in probabilities, not certainties, and this is true of pretty much everything, including god, heliocentrism, etc.

Second, cryonics may have a small chance of succeeding - say, 1% (number pulled out of thin air) - but that's still enormously better than the alternative 0% chance of being revived after dieing in any other way. Dieing in the line of duty or after great accomplishment is similar to leaving a huge estate behind - it'll help somebody, just not you.

Third, re senile dementia, there is the possibility of committing suicide and undergoing cryonics. (Terry Pratchett spoke of a possible assisted suicide, although I see no indication he considered cryonics.)

If cryonics feels like a wash, that's a problem with our emotions. The math is pretty solid.

Comment author: pdf23ds 23 January 2010 12:22:21PM 0 points [-]

Third, re senile dementia, there is the possibility of committing suicide and undergoing cryonics.

http://lesswrong.com/lw/1mh/that_magical_click/1hp5