AlexMennen comments on Attention Lurkers: Please say hi - Less Wrong

35 Post author: Kevin 16 April 2010 08:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (617)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: AlexMennen 19 April 2010 01:03:10AM 7 points [-]

Hi.

Why would Less Wrong have an abnormally high percentage of lurkers? Also, being a lurker is not in black and white. For example. I mostly just lurk, but I post comments occasionally.

Comment author: Kevin 19 April 2010 01:37:47AM *  2 points [-]

I think Less Wrong has an abnormally high percentage of lurkers because if participating at any web site is intimidating, participating at Less Wrong is especially intimidating because of the high level of discourse and English linguistic proficiency.

For the strictest definition of lurker, if you have registered for an account you are not or are not longer a lurker, but the definition is really not important.

Comment author: apophenia 19 April 2010 03:44:28AM *  2 points [-]

I read the blog for two month before getting an account, and then continued to lurk, only upvoting and not commenting. I found that I felt like an observer without an account, and a silent participant with one.

Comment author: gregconen 19 April 2010 07:40:20AM 1 point [-]

Also, the karma system adds an additional barrier, at least in my mind. Knowing that your comment is going to be explicitly judged and your score added to a "permanent record" can be intimidating.

Comment author: Jowibou 19 April 2010 07:56:55AM *  2 points [-]

Whether we like it or not, that "intimidation" may be the single most important factor in keeping the level of discourse in the comments unusually high. Status games can be beneficial.

Comment author: gregconen 19 April 2010 03:50:39PM 1 point [-]

Indeed. I'm not saying the karma system is a bad thing.

Comment author: AlexMennen 20 April 2010 12:24:35AM 0 points [-]

This definition of lurker has the advantage of being clear-cut enough that numbers are meaningful, but does not represent as important a group in online community dynamics as the definition of lurker as someone who reads but does not post, regardless of whether or not he has an account.

Also, with that definition, I have not been a lurker for quite a while, and yet I appear to be accumulating free karma points for saying "hi" anyway. Not complaining.