radical_negative_one comments on Far & Near / Runaway Trolleys / The Proximity Of (Fat) Strangers - Less Wrong

9 Post author: botogol 23 January 2010 10:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AngryParsley 23 January 2010 10:33:48PM 9 points [-]

I thought most people chose not to push the fat man because there is no conceivably realistic way that a fat man could stop a train, even one as small as a trolley. Although the thought experiment tells us the fat man will stop the train, our knowledge of trains tells us that nothing stops trains. When I envision this scenario, I can't help but (realistically) imagine the trolly hitting the fat man, then continuing on and running over the five others.

See also: Ends Don't Justify Means (Among Humans)

Comment author: radical_negative_one 24 January 2010 07:58:29PM 3 points [-]

Perhaps the thought experiment would benefit from a sentence like this: "Omega appears and tells you that using the fat man would work."

Comment author: Jack 25 January 2010 04:06:43AM 1 point [-]

This is no better than stipulation.

Comment author: Larks 27 January 2010 10:39:41AM 1 point [-]

Yes- our ethical intuitions weren't designed to work in impossible cases.