bogus comments on Deontology for Consequentialists - Less Wrong

46 Post author: Alicorn 30 January 2010 05:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (247)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bogus 31 January 2010 02:15:49PM *  0 points [-]

I'm just jettisoning the entire justification and calling a preference a spade.

Good point. There is a lot of fuzziness around "preferences", "ethics", "aesthetics", "virtues" etc. Ultimately all of these seem to involve some axiological notion of "good", or "the good life", or "good character" or even "goods and services".

For instance, what should we make of the so-called "grim aesthetic"? Is grimness a virtue? Should it count as an ethic? If not, why not?

Comment author: loqi 01 February 2010 07:38:08AM 0 points [-]

The second virtue is relinquishment:

Relinquish the emotion which rests upon a mistaken belief, and seek to feel fully that emotion which fits the facts.

I think the necessary and sufficient conditions for "grimness" are found there.