= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Thomas comments on Complexity of Value ≠ Complexity of Outcome - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (198)
So you say, then a magic happens and something new is born.
No, it doesn't. Just the physics acted onto the engraved algorithms and/or data.
No magic; and yes all you have is algorithms and data. Obviously the algorithms contain an aspect of learning, and eventually the data guides decision pathways far more than the original algorithms; and even the algorithms themselves are mutable data.
edit: I should note, I'm just talking about some of our crude "AI" systems that we build today. I don't know that this would be the actual software architecture of anything that could become a superintelligence. But it would have these capabilities and more...
Crude or non crude AI, a physical configuration at the start and a physical configuration at any time since.
You can name it whatever you choose.