wedrifid comments on A Much Better Life? - Less Wrong

61 Post author: Psychohistorian 03 February 2010 08:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (173)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bogdanb 06 February 2010 01:15:09AM 4 points [-]

PlatypusNinja's point is confirmed by the fact that addiction happens with regards to things that weren't readily available during the vast majority of the time humans evolved.

Opium is the oldest in use I know of (after only a short search), but it was in very restricted use because of expense at that time. (I use “very restricted” in an evolutionary sense.)

Even things like sugar and fatty food, which might arguably be considered addictive, were not available during most of humans' evolution.

Addiction propensities for things that weren't around during evolution can't have been “debugged” via reproductive failure.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 06 February 2010 06:29:35AM 2 points [-]

addiction happens with regards to things that weren't readily available during the vast majority of the time humans evolved.

Alcohol is quite old and some people believe that it has exerted selection on some groups of humans.

Comment author: wedrifid 06 February 2010 06:31:07PM 0 points [-]

What sort of selection?

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 06 February 2010 09:48:22PM 1 point [-]

Selection against susceptibility to alcohol addiction. I don't think anyone has seriously proposed more specific mechanisms.