uninverted comments on Logical Rudeness - Less Wrong

65 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 29 January 2010 06:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (203)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bgrah449 29 January 2010 09:57:19PM *  6 points [-]

The more private a debate, the more likely people will be generous enough for this to happen; the more public, the more hostile they will be. Hostility is a status-grab, and people in arguments (including this forum) reward it if they think the grabber deserving. Similarly, generosity is low-status, and people who are generous in public debates have very little to gain. Publicly failing in the quantity necessary to maximize your learning growth is very low-status and not many people have the stomach for it.

EDIT: Being low-status also makes it much easier for people to stop responding to your arguments, as "That's not worthy of a response" is much more believable from the higher-status arguer when the status difference is high.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 January 2010 04:21:57AM 6 points [-]

Similarly, generosity is low-status

Wait, what?

Comment author: bgrah449 02 February 2010 05:20:22PM *  5 points [-]

When the pecking order is well-defined, we like to see it, but in a neck-and-neck competition, generosity is interpreted as deferral.