Comment on Conversation Halters

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:59:18 GMT

In cases such as the one you cited, the assumptions are not inescapable - a sane believer could be convinced that the experiment in question was a fraud after all when presented with convincing independent evidence of wrongdoing (e.g. photographic evidence of the psychic cheating), and a sane skeptic inversely.

Discuss