RobinZ comments on Conversation Halters - Less Wrong

38 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 February 2010 03:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: roland 21 February 2010 08:16:04PM -2 points [-]

Well, words are limited, I recommend Jaynes' example of the psychic he goes more into the math of it all.

Comment author: RobinZ 21 February 2010 08:26:04PM 0 points [-]

As I do not have access to Jaynes' book, this response is rather less than useful. I assume that Jaynes' example relates to observing just the demonstration of psychic powers - what I am suggesting is that further observations, causally related to the demonstration and those features which may suggest or oppose fraud, can overwhelm this initial difference in interpretation.

I think you might want to reconsider the scope within which appealing to differing initial assumptions is valid.

Comment author: komponisto 21 February 2010 08:28:07PM 3 points [-]

As I do not have access to Jaynes' book,

(Pssst....actually, you do.)

Comment author: RobinZ 21 February 2010 08:32:17PM 0 points [-]

That is convenient! Now I just need chapter and section numbers!

Comment author: Cyan 21 February 2010 09:53:48PM 3 points [-]

That's an incomplete preliminary version of the book; the published version has more material, particularly after Chapter 5.

Comment author: komponisto 21 February 2010 08:36:27PM 0 points [-]

Chapter 5 is what is being referenced, I believe.