Vive-ut-Vivas comments on Debunking komponisto on Amanda Knox (long) - Less Wrong

-5 Post author: rolf_nelson 02 February 2010 04:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (116)

Comments (116)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vive-ut-Vivas 03 February 2010 06:59:59PM *  3 points [-]

As someone who has no interest in the case (I haven't made any comment related to the case, nor read any of the discussions)

This appears to be the common denominator regarding people who think that Rolf has brought up game-changing information in his post.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 03 February 2010 07:12:52PM 0 points [-]

This appears to be the common denominator regarding people who think that Rolf has brought up game-changing information in his (long) post.

I don't think that he did. In fact, I can infer, without having read the discussions, that the information in Rolf's posts are likely contained in the discussions. So the only thing I think he did was to put them in a top-level post without making a sufficiently convincing case for his position.

Comment author: Vive-ut-Vivas 03 February 2010 07:15:07PM 2 points [-]

So the only thing I think he did was to put them in a top-level post without making a sufficiently convincing case for his position.

Exactly. Therefore, it was voted down. Is this not working as intended?

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit