komponisto comments on You're Entitled to Arguments, But Not (That Particular) Proof - Less Wrong

57 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 15 February 2010 07:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (221)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 16 February 2010 12:16:50AM 9 points [-]

http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/its-news-on-academia-not-climate.html

Yup, this behavior has long been typical when academics form competing groups, whether the public hears about such groups or not. If you knew how academia worked, this news would not surprise you nor change your opinions on global warming.

People are crazy, the world is mad. Of course there's gross misbehavior by climate scientists, just like the rest of academia is malfunctioning. But the amount of scrutiny leveled on climate science is vastly greater than the amount of scrutiny leveled on, say, the dietary scientists who randomly made up the idea that saturated fat was bad for you; and the scrutiny really hasn't turned up anything that bad, just typical behavior by "working" scientists. So I doubt that this is one of the cases where the academic field is just grossly entirely wrong.

Comment author: komponisto 16 February 2010 05:13:50PM 11 points [-]

People are crazy, the world is mad.

It just occurred to me that this really needs to be the title of a short popular book on heuristics and biases.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 16 February 2010 05:54:25PM 7 points [-]

The book title had already occurred to me, but it shouldn't be the first book in the series.

Comment author: Christian_Szegedy 17 February 2010 07:31:03AM 0 points [-]