CronoDAS comments on You're Entitled to Arguments, But Not (That Particular) Proof - Less Wrong

57 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 15 February 2010 07:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (221)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 17 February 2010 01:07:26PM *  0 points [-]

Deserts are mostly an ice-age phenomenon. The positive effects of increased evaporation and precipitation eventually dominate as temperatures rise. Check with the humidity rises in northern Australia to see the effect - or see:

"Sahara desert goes green, thanks to warming"

Comment author: CronoDAS 17 February 2010 02:47:05PM *  0 points [-]

Increased precipitation may also mean more hurricanes and other destructive storms. :(

Comment author: gregconen 17 February 2010 03:01:04PM 3 points [-]

Regardless of whether the ultimate effects of global warming are a net positive or negative, there are likely to be costly disruptions, as areas currently good for agriculture and/or habitation cease to be good for them, even if they're replaced by other areas.

Comment author: CronoDAS 17 February 2010 03:02:11PM 0 points [-]

Exactly.

Comment author: timtyler 17 February 2010 03:17:17PM 1 point [-]

I'm sure we can both produce a long list of positive and negative effects of global warming. Picking out items from the "negative" list does not constitute much of an argument - you have to look at the big picture.