If you look more carefully, you will see I asked him a couple reasonable questions; he did not respond; and that was that.

You asked him a couple reasonable questions. He did not respond. A few days later, you banned him.

I still don't understand what the problem is. Do you think I have ignored or misrepresented the best evidence in favor of the warmist position?

I have no idea if you have done done that. In the same way, If I had just read the "Amanda Knox is guilty" website I would have no idea if they had responded to the best arguments of the "Amanda Knox is innocent" crowd. But as with those websites your tone and form do not give me confidence that you have in fact done so. Maybe someone else can point out exactly what gives me that impression, I'm afraid I'm at a loss. Sorry.