byrnema comments on Strong moral realism, meta-ethics and pseudo-questions. - Less Wrong

18 [deleted] 31 January 2010 08:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (172)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: byrnema 01 February 2010 12:37:40AM 1 point [-]

If Omega altered the brain of every human so that we had completely different values, 'morality' wouldn't change.

Is this because morality is reserved for a particular list - the list we currently have -- rather than a token for any list that could be had?

Comment author: Furcas 01 February 2010 12:49:32AM 2 points [-]

It's because [long list of terminal values that current humans happen to share]-morality is defined by the long list of terminal values that current humans happen to share. It's not defined by the list of terminal values that post-Omega humans would happen to have.

Is arithmetic "reserved for" a particular list of axioms or for a token for any list of axioms? Neither. Arithmetic is its axioms and all that can be computed from them.