Psy-Kosh comments on Strong moral realism, meta-ethics and pseudo-questions. - Less Wrong

18 [deleted] 31 January 2010 08:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (172)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Psy-Kosh 01 February 2010 02:59:02PM 3 points [-]

Rationality is basically "how to make an accurate map of the world... and how to WIN (where win basically means getting what you "want" (where want includes all your preferences, stuff like morality, etc etc...)

Before rationality can tell you what to do, you have to tell it what it is you're trying to do.

If your goal is to save lives, rationality can help you find ways to do that. If your goal is to turn stuff into paperclips, rationality can help you find ways to do that too.

I'm not sure I quite understand you mean by "rationally motivating" reasons.

As far as objectively compelling to any sentient (let me generalize that to any intelligent being)... Why should there be any such thing? "Doing this will help ensure your survival" "But... what if I don't care about this?"

"doing this will bring joy" "So?"

etc etc... There are No Universally Compelling Arguments