MBlume comments on Open Thread: February 2010 - Less Wrong

1 Post author: wedrifid 01 February 2010 06:09AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (738)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: tut 13 February 2010 05:37:07PM *  1 point [-]

Does the behavior of things-that-behave-quantumly typically affect macro-level events...?

Yes. They only appear weird if you look at small enough scales, but classical electrons would not have stable orbits, so without quantum effects there'd be no stable atoms.

Is there some way to prove that quantum events are random, as opposed to caused deterministically by something we just haven't found?

No, but there is evidence. There is a proof that if they were caused by something unknown but deterministic (or if there even was a classical probability function for certain events) then they would follow Bell's inequalities. But that appears not to be the case.

Comment author: Alicorn 13 February 2010 05:42:42PM 1 point [-]

What are Bell's inequalities, and why do quantumly-behaving things with deterministic causes have to follow them?

Comment author: MBlume 15 February 2010 08:54:49AM 6 points [-]

Alicorn, if you're free after dinner tomorrow, I can probably explain this one.