jhuffman comments on The AI in a box boxes you - Less Wrong

102 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 02 February 2010 10:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (378)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alicorn 02 February 2010 09:17:55PM 58 points [-]

Everything I would have said on the topic of the post has been put forward already, so I'm just going to say: I'm disappointed that the post title doesn't begin with "In Soviet Russia".

Comment author: jhuffman 03 February 2010 02:16:19AM 1 point [-]

You sir, have won this thread.

Comment author: Alicorn 03 February 2010 02:18:07AM *  20 points [-]

I'm not a sir. Maybe I should start prefacing all my posts with a ♀?

Comment author: jhuffman 03 February 2010 12:41:09PM 9 points [-]

That would be pretty cool, but it was my error, not yours.

Comment author: CronoDAS 17 March 2010 09:31:34PM *  0 points [-]

As far as I'm concerned, "sir" is gender-neutral enough. All the female equivalents in English are awkward.

Edit: So, what honorific do you prefer? "Madam"?

Comment author: Alicorn 17 March 2010 09:50:44PM 7 points [-]

I am not a Starfleet officer. "Sir" is not appropriate.

I don't really like honorifics. "Miss" would be fine, I suppose, if you must have a sir-equivalent.

Comment author: arbimote 03 February 2010 03:28:09AM 5 points [-]

You sir, have made a gender assumption.

Comment author: jhuffman 03 February 2010 12:39:22PM 18 points [-]

So have you - yours just happened to be correct. But, point taken - sir or madam.