CarlShulman comments on The Craigslist Revolution: a real-world application of torture vs. dust specks OR How I learned to stop worrying and create one billion dollars out of nothing - Less Wrong

47 Post author: Kevin 10 February 2010 03:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (219)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CarlShulman 10 February 2010 11:35:56AM *  2 points [-]

The claim that Craigslist is far from long-run profit maximizing is pretty dubious. It's compatible with the evidence as far as I can see but not very likely. That claim may just be a nice excuse in one interview. Craigslist has for-profit investors, even if they claim to be hands-off.

Comment author: gwern 10 February 2010 11:00:51PM 0 points [-]

What investors?

"It is believed to be owned principally by Newmark, Buckmaster, and eBay (the three board members). eBay owns approximately 25%, and Newmark is believed to own the largest stake."

Given how eBay got its own Craigslist clone and is suing them, I'd say CL is far from long-run profit maximizing.

Comment author: CarlShulman 10 February 2010 11:27:36PM 0 points [-]

I wasn't familiar with the lawsuit, that's good evidence.

Comment author: Kevin 10 February 2010 11:39:48PM *  0 points [-]

Yeah, eBay is a hostile shareholder. I believe Craig gave an early employee/cofounder 25% of the company in a verbal agreement and that verbal 25% later became worth a lot of money.

Comment author: [deleted] 10 February 2010 04:23:34PM *  -1 points [-]

Reading that comment left me with an aftertaste of comma.

ETA: Judging by the downvote, this was a bad way of pointing out that the parent comment ended in a comma.