= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Roko comments on Demands for Particular Proof: Appendices - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (60)
There is more to a methodological article than changing someone's mind: you are making a method more explicit, and those who'd try to construct its ad-hoc version on the fly stronger.
I have negative expectations for that. You can't say "I have worked so hard to reach my own goals that if you don't pay me you are rude". The would be costumers decide what reassurances they require, and if you can't meet their requirements, too bad for your business.
Is this actually more than one person?
But there are only about 4k siteviews per day, and some of those are probably by the same person. Unless you meant 'have read something once...'
If a person with money can't accept that they were mistaken when you explain it to them, you're probably better off trying to get money from someone else.
I think there are people with money who can understand that demanding particular proof is unreasonable, even if they did it.