Vladimir_Nesov comments on Hedging our Bets: The Case for Pursuing Whole Brain Emulation to Safeguard Humanity's Future - Less Wrong

11 Post author: inklesspen 01 March 2010 02:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (244)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 01 March 2010 08:19:35PM *  2 points [-]

I agree, if you construct this upload-aggregate and manage to ban other uses for the tech. This was reflected in the next sentence of my comment (maybe not too clearly):

To apply uploads specifically to FAI as opposed to generation of more existential risk, they have to be closely managed, which may be very hard to impossible once the tech gets out.

Comment author: utilitymonster 13 December 2010 05:30:00AM *  2 points [-]

Especially if WBE comes late (so there is a big hardware overhang), you wouldn't need a lot of time to spend loads of subjective years designing FAI. A small lead time could be enough. Of course, you'd have to be first and have significant influence on the project.

Edited for spelling.

Comment author: Jordan 01 March 2010 09:57:14PM 0 points [-]

I don't think this would be impossibly difficult. If an aggressive line of research is pursued then the first groups to create an upload will be using hardware that would make immediate application of the technology difficult. Commercialization likely wouldn't follow for years. That would potentially give government plenty of time to realize the potential of the technology and put a clamp on it.

At that point the most important thing is that the government (or whatever regulatory body will have oversight of the upload aggregate) is well informed enough to realize what they are dealing with and have sense enough to deal with it properly. To that end, one of the most important things we can be doing now is trying to insure that that regulatory body will be well informed enough when the day comes.