= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ciphergoth comments on Open Thread: February 2010, part 2 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (857)
I hate to sound complimentary, but... I get the impression that the comments on LW are substantially higher-quality than the comments on OB.
And that the comments on LW come from a smaller group of core readers as well, which is to some extent unfortunate.
I wonder if it's the karma system or the registration requirement that does it?
Threading helps a lot too.
OB has threading (although it doesn't seem as good/ as used as on LW).
That may be a recent innovation; it wasn't threaded in the days when Eliezer's articles appeared there.
I think it happened immediately after LW went live. Robin revised a bunch of things at that time.
Yup; I asked Robin why he was willing to make all those changes and upgrades during the LW/OB split, when his rationale for splitting was that he didn't trust the LW/Reddit codebase. I don't remember what his answer was.