pengvado comments on Explicit Optimization of Global Strategy (Fixing a Bug in UDT1) - Less Wrong

17 Post author: Wei_Dai 19 February 2010 01:30AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pengvado 19 February 2010 07:28:53AM *  3 points [-]

You don't want to randomize in this case. Omega has given you a unique ID. Exploiting that information in a well-chosen deterministic strategy gets you a higher chance of winning than does picking randomly.

Comment author: timtyler 19 February 2010 08:32:32AM -1 points [-]

1A 2B makes more sense than the reverse - I would go with that.

The "by symmetry" argument in the post should be rejected, since being given "1" and being given "2" are not really "symmetrical".