SilasBarta comments on Case study: abuse of frequentist statistics - Less Wrong

25 Post author: Cyan 21 February 2010 06:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (96)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: komponisto 22 February 2010 12:29:17AM *  0 points [-]

P(E) = P(E|H) P(H) + P(E|~H)P(~H)

The quantities P(H), P(E|H), and P(E|~H) are in general independent of each other, in the sense that you can move any one of them without changing the others -- provided you adjust P(E) accordingly.

Comment author: SilasBarta 22 February 2010 12:38:22AM 0 points [-]

Thanks, that helps. See how I apply that point in my reply to Psy-Kosh here.