Douglas_Knight comments on Babies and Bunnies: A Caution About Evo-Psych - Less Wrong

52 Post author: Alicorn 22 February 2010 01:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (823)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 22 February 2010 10:06:58PM *  1 point [-]

I saw that hypothesis when I was looking for the picture, but it doesn't apply to the particular picture, where the cuckoo is the only chick in the nest, in fact, too big for even the mother to perch on the rim. That was way beyond the pictures I'd seen before, where the cuckoo is merely bigger than the mother. Actually, the picture doesn't make sense me: how can the mother provide enough food for this gigantic chick, much bigger than her whole brood?

Comment author: CronoDAS 23 February 2010 03:20:58PM 1 point [-]

Maybe that's not the mother. Some birds will feed cuckoos in nests not their own.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 23 February 2010 05:29:20PM 0 points [-]

That's pretty crazy! I'd like a cite.

That seems like pretty strong evidence for the superstimulus hypothesis. Do they also feed chicks of their own species in other nests? Is it just philanderers? otherwise, it sounds like pretty poor fitness.

Comment author: CronoDAS 23 February 2010 05:32:41PM *  0 points [-]

I just recall reading it somewhere, sorry. It could easily be wrong. (I did find something talking about a goose feeding a bunch of fish, though.)