JamesAndrix comments on Babies and Bunnies: A Caution About Evo-Psych - Less Wrong

52 Post author: Alicorn 22 February 2010 01:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (823)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 22 February 2010 10:32:37PM *  1 point [-]

How come everyone is missing the obvious answer?

Good question. It didn't appear until here. The obvious answer is that cuteness does in fact serve purposes distinct from making people nurture every baby they come across.

Comment author: byrnema 22 February 2010 10:40:49PM 1 point [-]

I don't get it. This other purpose is nutritive?

Comment author: wedrifid 22 February 2010 10:48:33PM 1 point [-]

Maintaining a food source until a better time to eat it seems like a somewhat better reason to find bunnies cute than because they look like babies. Particularly because eating or at least killing other people's babies is a strategy that some of our near primate relatives use. Significant evidence could persuade me but I'm just not seeing it.

Comment author: byrnema 22 February 2010 10:53:14PM *  3 points [-]

There may be reasons for experiencing "cute" besides stimulating parental care, but I'm skeptical about the food-source-theory because I think things are cute independent of their nutritive value. The only connection may be that adult herbivores tend be cuter than adult carnivores, and they also taste better.

Nevertheless, I was thinking about what kinds of food I think are cute. And this brought me in an entirely different direction. Anything miniature is cute. (Even a mini-paperclip.) Is this a different sense of cute again? Is our parental duty stimulated so broadly we can experience it in response to a mini-hamburger?

Comment author: wedrifid 22 February 2010 11:01:50PM 2 points [-]

That's an interesting take on it. I was going along a similar train of thought of 'anything miniature is cute'. I just didn't interpret it as parental. I took it as 'Miniature things are barely worth it but are growing extremely fast. Throw it back and eat it when it is ten times the nutritional value in a couple of weeks!' My surprise would then be that we experience even in response to things that are not a 'mini-burger'. I'm not going to benefit from eating clippy unless I am iron deficient and I embed him in an apple for a while to rust before I eat it!

Comment author: RobinZ 22 February 2010 11:06:39PM 0 points [-]

Your comment made me wonder about the dietary availability of rust, which seems rather low - the paperclip might not even be useful then!