thomblake comments on Shock Level 5: Big Worlds and Modal Realism - Less Wrong

15 [deleted] 25 May 2010 11:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (140)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: thomblake 26 May 2010 03:35:21PM *  0 points [-]

the Copernican revolution with respect to your place in the multiverse

This is interesting... I saw Luciano Floridi give a talk recently where he talked about the "information revolution" and its relationship to past revolutions (borrowing from Freud's history). To summarize:

  1. Copernicus displaced us from the center of the universe
  2. Darwin displaced us from the center of the biosphere
  3. Freud revealed that we're not fully rational and transparent to ourselves
  4. The information revolution (which he identifies with Turing) revealed that we're not unique in terms of our ability to process information and be part of information-processing systems

I'd swap Turing for Weiner, but that's really an unimportant turf war.

ETA: relevant paper - www.philosophyofinformation.net/publications/pdf/tisip.pdf - pdf warning

Comment author: orthonormal 27 May 2010 02:39:14AM 0 points [-]

Whoops, formatting issue.

Comment author: thomblake 27 May 2010 02:48:32AM 0 points [-]

Thanks. I'm not sure if it's the web app or Google Chrome.

Comment author: RobinZ 27 May 2010 05:03:04AM 0 points [-]

I've seen a lot of HTML errors from the Less Wrong page on every browser I've tried.

Comment author: PeterS 27 May 2010 05:13:29AM 2 points [-]

I've noticed that too. What's odder is that they seem to come and go. I have no evidence, but I swear that sometimes I'll see a link to google in a comment on one day, and the link rendered as /">google in the same comment on another day, etc. Strange.

Comment author: jimrandomh 27 May 2010 01:22:59PM *  1 point [-]

I have noticed this too. It looks like bytes get randomly corrupted or deleted during transfer. This would indicate a hardware problem. Next time I see it, I'll 'View Source' and observe exactly what's wrong with the HTML I received.