Er okay, I guess in addition to knowing how to google you also have to know how to read story updates and not trust conspiracy websites with html straight out of 1998. They were cases of mistaken identity.

Edit: If anyone wants to continue talking about this, move it to the other post. This one has been derailed enough.

Again, you make wacky claims without mentioning the devastating refutation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijackers_in_the_September_11_attacks#Cases_of_mistaken_identity

Visibly deceptive and non-truth-seeking antics like this are not going to work around here. I suggest that you and woozle read up on cognitive biases and bayesian epistemology before trying to argue for this here. One handy debiasing technique:

http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/02/write-your-hypothetical-apostasy.html

If you do this well, and post your writeup on your personal website or the like, you might be able to get folk to take you seriously, or you might realize that the epistemic procedures you're using (selective search for confirming examples and 'allied' sources, etc) aren't very truth-tracking.

In the meantime, this stuff doesn't belong in the comments section of this post.