= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Alicorn comments on What is Bayesianism? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (211)
You know, I have little interest in 9/11 Truth, but I have no patience for the "but it would be so obvious" reply to Truthers. Here is how that conversation translates in my head:
Truther: I think the towers came down due to a deliberate demolition by our government. I think this because thus and so.
Non-Truther: But the government would never have done anything so easy to find out about, because it would carry massive risk. Everybody would know about it.
Truther: Well, if people were paying attention to thus and so, they'd know -
Non-Truther: BUT SINCE I DIDN'T ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THUS AND SO IT'S CLEARLY NOT SOMETHING EVERYBODY KNOWS ABOUT AND I CAN'T HEAR YOU NANANANANANANANA.
Just to clarify: Do you think that is what I'm doing here?
It was at least strongly reminiscent, enough that under your comment seemed like a good place to put mine, but I did not intend to attack you specifically.