= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Larks comments on Creating a Less Wrong prediction market - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (52)
I don't think many people use karma to judge a member; rather, frequently reading their posts causes me to respect them, and this correlates with their karma.
Having said that, I am generalising from one case.
Incidentally, there's already quite a karma-market in discussing karma. You could easily generate most of your karma discussing karma.
Upvoted.
You could easily generate most of your karma being cleverly meta and self-referential.
Upvoted.
Upvoted to give you your 50,000th karma :-)
Is there any bound to the number of levels this works at? And if so, is this post at level omega?
Churck-Kleene ordinal!
Was that just ordinal-dropping, or is there actually a reason why that particular ordinal has something to do with this situation?
ciphergoth's post was at the level w (omega). Posts about ciphergoth's post and posts about those resulting posts are at level w + 1, w + 2, etc. Posts about that entire sequence of posts would be level 2w. Then you can talk about the sequence (w, 2w, 3w, 4w, ...) itself. The recursive tower seems endless, but there actually is a least upper bound, and that bound is the Church-Kleene ordinal.
Ok, you get 100 w.
If anyone wants some w+1, 2w, etc, please explain why.
I doubt it.
Well since it mentioned level omega, it has to be at level omega +1...