prase comments on Superstimuli, setpoints, and obesity - Less Wrong

-1 Post author: taw 26 February 2010 11:59PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: prase 27 February 2010 12:11:33PM 5 points [-]

The most common accepted answer is some sort of superstimulus theory - modern food is so tasty people find it irresistible.

Why modern food? Doesn't the answer work when modern is replaced by any? Modern food doesn't have to be tastier, it is enough if it is more easily obtained.

almost any "traditional" food seems to taste better than almost any "modern" food

As others have said, this is a very weak argument. First, you have to specify what you mean by modern and traditional food. I suspect that you may subconsciously conflate "traditional" and "tasty", so a specification would be helpful. Then you have to show that your preferences in eating generalise to other people. Finally, explain why modern food was ever invented when it is less tasty than the traditional one. I don't think that people change their eating habits towards less tasty food.