zero_call comments on Mental Crystallography - Less Wrong

13 Post author: Alicorn 27 February 2010 01:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: zero_call 27 February 2010 04:01:39AM 5 points [-]

Is it true that people process things so differently? Or is it more of a subtle difference with overblown consequences? Can we change the bounds of the way we perceive?

Comment author: Nisan 27 February 2010 07:05:03AM 14 points [-]

Is it true that people process things so differently?

Yes. I'd love to list a bunch of first- and second-hand anecdotal evidence for this, but anecdotal evidence is not great evidence. Instead, consider the example of synaesthesia, and the fact that synaesthetes can live for decades without realizing that not all people are synaesthetes. It's easy not to notice huge differences in the way people's minds work.

Comment author: SilasBarta 01 March 2010 10:03:56PM 0 points [-]

I wish there were some general test you could take that tells you if you differ from other people in a fundamental way like this.

I've heard of a condition that's like "superempathy" where you actually feel the pain you see in others as if it were done to you. E.g., you see someone injected with a needle, you feel as if you were stabbed with a needle. Such a test would tell you whether you have a normal "ick" reaction, or some sort of abnormal ability.

Comment author: CronoDAS 01 March 2010 10:06:36PM 1 point [-]

That came from a novel by Octavia Butler; as far as I know, it isn't real.

Comment author: SilasBarta 01 March 2010 10:19:51PM 0 points [-]

That's not where I got it.

Comment author: CronoDAS 02 March 2010 01:37:05AM 3 points [-]

The novels in question were Parable of the Sower and Parable of the Talents and the main character of the novels has "hyperempathy syndrome" which has exactly the effects you describe. And it was invented for the novel; it isn't real.

Comment author: orthonormal 28 February 2010 05:22:35PM 0 points [-]

Upvoted both the good question and the good answer.

Comment author: Jesse_L 18 March 2010 02:53:25AM 1 point [-]

My friend thinks in print, usually in the font of whatever she last read. In conversation, she mentally transcribes every word. Not surprisingly, she reads super fast and dislikes homophonic puns.

Comment author: wedrifid 18 March 2010 03:30:42AM 2 points [-]

Wow! I wonder if you could change the nature of her thoughts by priming her with font styles with different associations...

Comment author: Jack 18 March 2010 03:41:21AM 1 point [-]

Or could you slow her down with difficult to read fonts? Shut her up with wingdings...

Comment author: Alicorn 18 March 2010 03:59:41AM 1 point [-]

I think in text too.

Comment author: CronoDAS 18 March 2010 04:13:10AM 1 point [-]

My inner monologue is aural, but I sometimes read just by looking at the words without imagining the way they sound. I do tend to hear words when I type them, though.

(I can also "play back" songs in my head, but often it's only the melody line...)

Comment author: ABranco 30 March 2010 02:30:44AM 0 points [-]

In particular, I have realized that trying to visualize the words as you hear them works wonderfully both for:

(a) focusing on what the other person is saying, especially if the theme is difficult to grasp and/or if you tend to get easily distracted; and

(b) associating sounds to words while learning foreign languages.