Alicorn comments on Meetup: Bay Area: Sunday, March 7th, 7pm - Less Wrong

6 Post author: JustinShovelain 02 March 2010 09:18PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alicorn 04 March 2010 08:16:43PM *  3 points [-]

Because I'm curious about who you are. If nobody shows up claiming (via nametag or other mechanism) to be Clippy, I won't find out.

Comment author: Clippy 04 March 2010 08:20:44PM 4 points [-]

But what if you get hostile toward me because of my values?

Comment author: Alicorn 04 March 2010 08:21:44PM 7 points [-]

Meh, I already live in a houseful of consequentialists and get along fine.

Comment author: JGWeissman 04 March 2010 08:30:20PM 1 point [-]

You don't think you'd be able to recognize Clippy by eir behavior?

Comment author: Alicorn 04 March 2010 08:35:09PM 2 points [-]

Nope, pretty sure I couldn't.

Comment author: Larks 04 March 2010 11:28:33PM 7 points [-]

Leave large amounts of short aluminium strips lying around. Damage paperclips and watch for pained expressions. Examine people's fingers for calluses from manipulating small pieces of metal too much.

Of course, this wouldn't work if Clippy's gone entirely automated.

Comment author: Alicorn 04 March 2010 11:30:26PM 3 points [-]

I will be really impressed with Clippy's method acting if ey shows up to a meetup in character.

Comment author: Morendil 04 March 2010 11:48:05PM 3 points [-]

You really want the "it" pronoun here, I think.

Comment author: JGWeissman 05 March 2010 12:01:58AM 0 points [-]

"it" is an impersonal pronoun. Clippy is clearly a person. The singular "they" could work, but I don't like it because it can be easily confused with the more common plural "they".

Comment author: Clippy 05 March 2010 12:12:37AM *  4 points [-]

Like I said before: I don't care what pronoun is used for me. I don't base my existence on whether I'm a "he" or a "she" or an "it" or even a "they". It's a distraction I'd rather do without, since apparently, posters do care whether they're called a he or she or xe or whatever, when I don't even want to spend cognition on the matter to begin with!

(And since you mention it, calling me "they" is actually somewhat accurate, unless the meaning of your statement crucially depends on distinguising the individual copies of me.)

Just say whatever you want, as long as I know I'm the referent. And spend your time talking about important things, please.

Comment author: JGWeissman 05 March 2010 12:18:18AM 2 points [-]

I know you don't care. But I do. I wouldn't want to confuse you with nonpersons.

I would most likely start refering to you with "they", if you start refering to yourself as "we".

Comment author: Clippy 05 March 2010 12:29:52AM 4 points [-]

If I call myself "we/they", then I'll have to waste more time explaining why I do that to everyone who asks.

If you really want to make me happy, buy lots of paperclips, and store them in a place that's safe from nature.

If you really want to make me happy with your comments, talk about something else that's actually important.

And finally, if you absolutely must choose a pronoun, then hold a quick vote about whether I more resemble large-sex-sell humans ("females") or small-sex-cell humans ("males") through my desires and writing style, and I'll stick with that.

Either way, this debate must end.

Comment author: AdeleneDawner 05 March 2010 12:15:10AM 2 points [-]

It's already been established that Clippy doesn't care, so it's a matter of personal preference, really. I suppose it's debatable whether it should come down to the reader's preference (in the form of some established norm, I expect) or the speaker's, though. Personally, I'd prefer that it be the speaker's call.

(Yes, that last sequence of words is weird. Why don't we have a natural-sounding word to use in place of 'speaker' when someone's communicating by typing, yet? Or does 'writer' flow for other people, there, and it's me being weird?)

Comment author: Nic_Smith 05 March 2010 12:35:39AM 1 point [-]

Why don't we have a natural-sounding word to use in place of 'speaker' when someone's communicating by typing, yet? Or does 'writer' flow for other people, there, and it's me being weird?

Both "writer" and "speaker" "sound" fine to me. YMMV.

Comment author: JGWeissman 05 March 2010 12:24:01AM 0 points [-]

See my response to Clippy.

(My brain seems to have automatically interpreted "speaker" as pointing to the more abstract category containing both writers and speakers. But it is rarely safe to deduce that you aren't being weird because I can understand you.)

Comment author: dclayh 05 March 2010 12:14:03AM 2 points [-]

Much less in costume!

Comment author: JGWeissman 04 March 2010 11:40:36PM 0 points [-]

Um, are Alicorn and I being downvoted for Spivak pronouns? (parent voted back up to 0)

Comment author: Kevin 06 March 2010 01:31:43AM 1 point [-]

Can we start guessing now? I guess Wei Dai.

Comment author: Alicorn 06 March 2010 01:32:27AM 0 points [-]

Wei Dai hasn't identified himself as Clippy, at least.