komponisto comments on The fallacy of work-life compartmentalization - Less Wrong

14 Post author: Morendil 04 March 2010 10:59PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (91)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Rain 05 March 2010 02:31:32AM *  5 points [-]

Troubleshooting, enabling new functionality in, or patching a ridiculously expensive piece of software managed by a ridiculously large team of technical people.

ETA: I understand that those one or two hours are potentially capable of making up the rest of my salary, at least from the perspective of someone who might want to pay me to perform such a duty, but I would also state that the lack of general feedback for the other 38 to 39 hours, and the requirement to show up to the office and generally pretend not to be blatantly non-busy, is akin to the problem humans have with large numbers: it's very difficult to feel like I've accomplished something for a few, tiny moments of work involving check boxes and following documentation, and it's highly irrational that I have to pretend I'm getting paid for 8 hours of hard work a day, when all they really want is 1 per week. That's in addition to the fact the dollar amounts involved invoke the large number problem itself...

Comment author: komponisto 05 March 2010 06:43:45PM 2 points [-]

What do they actually, explicitly expect you to be doing when you're not doing what they (really) pay you to do?

Comment author: Rain 05 March 2010 06:59:16PM 3 points [-]

Reading and updating documentation; assisting related teams; developing improvements to the system; refining existing business or technical processes; coordinating between various technical teams; other things I can't think of right now, I'm sure.

The reason I don't do any of that (or make it my one hour a week for a particular week) is that I get all the rewards without it. See the thread on incentive structures.