Larks comments on Selfishness Signals Status - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (89)
(Voted back up towards 0.)
False. Slouching is a submissive gesture. It is signalling that you are not making a challenge to the more dominant members. Standing up straight but in a relaxed way is higher status. A strong core, head naturally raised, with gender specific variations. Remainder of the body should not be rigid but convey a balance of comfort and control. Gender specific variations tend to emphasize sexual organs in an offhand manner (where the low status signal is the reverse.)
Agree up to the comma. (The rest varies with context.)
Yes.
I don't agree with this one. Of the things people care about enough to signal through clothes, comfort tends to be low.
I don't think adding 'because you're obviously not doing it for yourself' aids in understanding the apologizing status-dynamic much...
You find that pleasurable? (Agree with the 'affected enough' part.)
Pleasure is a distraction again. Just say 'want'.
More or less.
I can think of times when it would be high-status; namely, if you're already seen to be high-status, it can show insolence.
Insolence: "I want your status but I don't have it... yet."
It's certainly higher status than submissiveness but not as high status as conveying that there isn't an immediate authority to whom you need to be insolent towards (whether that is because you are granted an acceptably high status through rapport with those above or because you grant it to yourself without a challenge that you accept.)
At the Oxford Union, James Dray (President) wore a hoody to debates (everyone else being in black tie) and slouched in the President's chair. It made him seem a little aloof and supremely confident.
Similarly, Caesar was excused from standing before the Senate.