JGWeissman comments on Open Thread: March 2010, part 2 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: RobinZ 11 March 2010 05:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (334)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: cousin_it 11 March 2010 09:11:05PM *  8 points [-]

Am I the only one to think that no, creating military robots isn't a "good career path" towards friendly AI, because creating military robots is inherently unfriendly to humanity? Especially if you live in the US and know that your robots will be used in aggressive wars against poorer countries. It's some kind of crazy ethical blindness that most Americans seem to have for some reason, where "our guys" are human beings, but arbitrarily chosen foreigners deserve whatever they get... Just like this incident I saw on HN when one guy asked about career prospects working for the occupation force in Iraq, and another answered that it'll be an "amazing and unique experience". You'll note my reply there was much more concise.

Comment author: JGWeissman 11 March 2010 09:30:14PM 1 point [-]

Creating military robots can be friendly, if:

Lbh fryy gur ebobgf gb nyy fvqrf, ercynpvat uhzna nezvrf, naq unir gurz evttrq gb abg npghnyyl svtug rnpu bgure, ohg vafgrnq gnxr njnl gur rssrpgvir cbjre bs gur tbireazragf gung jnagrq nyy gur jnef.

(Rot13)

Comment author: cousin_it 11 March 2010 09:37:20PM 0 points [-]

Unfortunately, this isn't a realistic option if you're an employee at a big military contractor, which is the most likely scenario...

Comment author: JGWeissman 11 March 2010 09:54:41PM 0 points [-]

Well, yeah, there is no way someone at standard human level would pull off what happened in that story.