= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
RobinZ comments on Open Thread: March 2010, part 2 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (334)
Poll: when making a new substantive top-level post, what kinds of summary are acceptable?
This is a checkbox poll, and therefore votes for multiple options may be entered - for each option, a separate karma balance will be offered. In the event that some important option is immediately noticed to be missing, another poster may offer an option-karma balance pair without destroying the poll.
Formal abstract, consisting of one or a few paragraphs, indented.
Karma balance.
"tl;dr" summary, indicated by "tl;dr" abbreviation.
Karma balance.
Précis, consisting of one or two sentences, italics.
Karma balance.
No summary.
Karma balance.
If I think style choices are best left up to the poster I should vote for all the options?
Yes.
Edit: Elaborating in light of the downvote - if there exists some large fraction which think it isn't important enough to imply a policy on, then that will be reflected by the percentage differences between the options growing small.