army1987 comments on Undiscriminating Skepticism - Less Wrong

97 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 14 March 2010 11:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1329)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wnoise 20 March 2010 05:42:30AM 11 points [-]

If a baby/fetus has a mind, in my books it should be accorded rights - more and more so as it develops. I fail to see, moreover, where the dividing line ought to be in your view. Not to slippery-slope you but - why stop at infants?

The standard answer is that at that point there is no longer a conflict with the rights of the women whose body the infant was hooked into. We don't generally require that people give up their bodily autonomy to support the life of others.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 October 2013 03:05:31AM 0 points [-]

In the first month of pregnancy, right, but in the seventh month you can Caesarean the baby out of the mother and put it into an incubator, can't you?

Comment author: [deleted] 06 October 2013 05:47:43AM 0 points [-]

Not without some risk to both, the exact amounts depending on the situation..

Comment author: [deleted] 06 October 2013 05:53:38AM 0 points [-]

(I'm assuming that by “some” you mean ‘larger than that of either abortion or natural childbirth’, otherwise it wouldn't be relevant. Right?)

Comment author: [deleted] 06 October 2013 09:21:14AM 1 point [-]

Smaller would be relevant too, for the opposite reason.