Strange7 comments on Disconnect between Stated/Implemented Preferences - Less Wrong

-4 Post author: Strange7 17 March 2010 02:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Strange7 17 March 2010 04:35:39AM 3 points [-]

Should I remove it?

Comment author: JGWeissman 17 March 2010 04:47:14AM 0 points [-]

Once it is published, I believe that deleting really only removes the links to it from the various post feeds. But do take it as a learning experience.

Comment author: Strange7 17 March 2010 04:51:54AM *  3 points [-]

Well, at least I've got enough of a buffer to try again.

But do take it as a learning experience.

I always try to. So long as we're on the subject, any tips on top-level post subject selection and formatting?

Edit: I spoke too soon.

Comment author: JGWeissman 17 March 2010 05:14:04AM 1 point [-]

My preferences for top level posts, which seem to be a higher standard than the community average, is that they should present some novel insight into a relevant topic, and reflect some research into previous work on the topic; or that they offer a deep review of a relevant work external to Less Wrong.

Comment author: RobinZ 17 March 2010 12:32:22PM 1 point [-]

Bear in mind that those with lower standards will make more top-level posts.

Comment author: JGWeissman 17 March 2010 05:10:03PM 0 points [-]

Do you mean to imply I am underestimating the community average standard? I was basing my assessment on karma scores on posts I consider low quality, not so much on what people decide to post.

Comment author: RobinZ 17 March 2010 05:15:09PM 0 points [-]

Good point - I still think it is relevant to note that those with low standards will be more willing to post, but given that your evidence is independent, the "bear in mind" is unwarranted.

Comment author: orthonormal 21 March 2010 07:30:38PM *  1 point [-]

My default place to write something is the Open Thread or a comment on a relevant post. It's only if I realize that an idea needs to be a top-level post (because it's too important and not found elsewhere in a post, or because it's a lengthy development of a key idea) that I make it into one.

As you can see from my two articles, this may be too strict a standard, but I think it's in the right direction relative to the median.