Morendil comments on Let There Be Light - Less Wrong

39 Post author: Alicorn 17 March 2010 07:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (90)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: mattnewport 18 March 2010 04:27:16AM *  0 points [-]

Where's everyone getting their results from? I had the test properly administered once (I had a temp job as a student for a day being a guinea pig for people learning to administer the test) and I think I've taken it online at some point but I don't remember the results. I just found a free online test through Google and got ENTP but I don't know how reliable a random online automated test is. The 'official' Meyers Briggs page seems to suggest that you have to pay a trained professional to administer the test to get 'correct' results. I remember getting the distinct impression of a somewhat dubious money making scheme when I did my day as a guinea pig.

I once again had the problem I mentioned elsewhere taking the online test just now that I really struggle to answer the questions. Very few of them have a clear answer for me and most I could feel comfortable answering either way so I feel like I'm more or less picking at random. Maybe it is supposed to all come out in the wash.

Comment author: Morendil 18 March 2010 08:32:12AM *  1 point [-]

I had the test administered by a "certified" assessor, but as the venue was the AYE conference it kind of came free with attendance.

I tested as (surprise, surprise) INTP, although from having had previously used online tests I'd self-identified as INTJ.

really struggle to answer the questions (...) Maybe it is supposed to all come out in the wash.

I'm the same, and yes, it's supposed not to matter. I'd agree with Ben that the test isn't necessarily much more rigorous than a horoscope, but I also agree with Alicorn that the point is more to raise awareness about the existence of more modes of being than the one you're most familiar with. It's a good antidote to generalizing from a sample of size one.