RobinZ comments on The two insights of materialism - Less Wrong

18 Post author: Academian 24 March 2010 02:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (132)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Morendil 24 March 2010 03:39:52PM *  9 points [-]

By materialism, I mean the belief that the world and people are composed entirely of something called matter

Ick. If the universe can be adequately explained by thinking of as arising from graph operations, then I desire to believe that the universe arises from graph operations.

In other words, being a "materialist" does not commit me to thinking of matter as fundamental. Being a materialist commits me to believing that all of my experiences can be adequately explained in the same terms that explain what the ordinary stuff around me consists of - whatever the bottom levels of the explanation turn out to be.

Comment author: RobinZ 24 March 2010 08:59:45PM 3 points [-]

Ick. If the universe can be adequately explained by thinking of as arising from graph operations, then I desire to believe that the universe arises from graph operations.

That's why I prefer the term "philosophical naturalist".

Comment author: Jack 25 March 2010 12:37:12PM 4 points [-]

"Physicalist" is the term used in philosophy now for precisely this reason. It just means that you believe the world is composed of whatever our best theory of physics says it is composed of.

Comment author: Academian 25 March 2010 12:20:46PM 0 points [-]

Me too. I wanted to address "fear of matter" head on with the term "materialism".